The Criminals, Flying Monkeys and Loyalty.

“Loyalty” is heavily used in manipulation and in recruiting Flying Monkeys to do the work of the Criminal.

The Criminal uses such terms as, “We have been friends since school“, or, “We have been friends for so long, you know me by now, and you know that I would never do that.” and so on using the years of a relationship to create a believe in “knowing” the person.

The Criminal can meet up with a person 5 times a year, or less, and as long as the relationship is long term it appears honourable, good, and the other feels that they know the other very well, in some cases even deeply. But the opposite is true.

It is an illusion that you know someone deeply either for a short time or long time, but we want to believe in honesty, and we want to believe that the people who we love, who are with us, who we call friend, as a good guy, just like we assume that we also are.

I was once approached by a person who assumed that he knew a criminal as a good honest person who loved and respected children, and who had created a Character Assassination of my name. This man said to me that his “friend” was a good decent person, and that he had known her 30 years, since Hugh School, and therefore she is innocent and telling the truth (her lies in the Character Assassination).
She had either manipulated him into thinking that length of time that we know someone is proof of their being a good person, or he just naturally assumed that he new her that long so she must be telling the truth.

The point is that loyalty to her gave him the unconditional belief that she is truthful and would never lie, and that the claims that I had made of her abusing her children and using Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy to make her youngest daughter sick and then cashing in on her daughters illness and mental suffering to create hate and dislike of me claiming that I had stalked her daughter and affected her mental health.

People can assume that what they see on the outside is the true and genuine situation, and if the children appear healthy, decent and good then the parents must be startling in their parenting.

When I home schooled my children I did not care who got the credit for their excellent manners and good schooling. Being the type that prefers to stay home my wife would take the children to events and places and would get so much praise for her excellent work in bringing up such nicely behaved children.
The reality is that my wife had many mental issues, drunk a lot, and didn’t have much to do with the genuine homeschooling a tall, but she always smiled politely and thanked people for recognizing her hard work and good standards bringing up the children. It got so bad that my children would come home angry because she was getting the credit for my work effort with them.

When people assume a situation or the character of a person they can be easily fooled into thinking that the narcissist is something that he or she is not, and therefore they can be easily fooled into becoming a Flying Monkey for the narcissist manipulator.

When the Police become victims of such assumptions they can be talked into assuming innocence or guilt where it is not, and therefore become a tool to be used by Criminals to harm innocent people.

How long we have known a person does not show us their guilt or innocence.
The man you have known a day could be far more innocent that the friend you knew at school years ago.
Unless we live in their house we do not know, and we should assume that we don’t know, and we should assume that we should not do such a foolish thing as guess, especially with no real evidence and especially when someone visits telling “Stories” about someone.

This all reminds me of the book I am currently reading about Ron and Clint Howard and their home life which is in reality far from the truth that I had assumed that they lived.
All listeners (people who hear stories about someone) should never assume that ‘they know about the person being spoken about”, and all Police should investigate even their close friends if the friend is involved in something that they claim to be innocent of.

Remember the saying, “No stone unturned?”
In the Character Assassination of me the Police failed me desperately when they did listen to the accusations of the mentally disturbed daughter and saw them as facts, yet they did not get a mind doctor to investigate the mental health of the (false) accuser, if they had they would have discovered that the daughter was suffering from Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and was being controlled by Gaslighting and The Stockholm Syndrome.
Therefore the daughters claims were merely repeating what her mother had convinced her to say, but could be used to destroy an innocent person’s life, which in many ways they have done because the Police assumed the innocence of the School Teacher and did not investigate everyone.

There should be no assumptions in Police work, and no “friends“, and no stone unturned, meaning that the accusers and the accused should be investigated, because the Criminal Element today has filtered itself into society in such a way that it is hard to tell who is really guilty or not.
This being done then the Police will not be used by the Criminal Groups in supporting ways that the Police are not aware of.

The Police should stick to the facts, put all friendships aside, and in any form of suspicion of mental coercion the person they are suspect of being manipulated should be removed from the guardians or parents and seen by a completely in dependent Mind Doctor to find out the condition of that person’s mental health and whether this person is just being loyal to the accuser or drugged and mentally manipulated.

All the best from
James Martin Sandbrook.
10th of February, 2022.